|
TOWN OF NORTH TOPSAIL BEACH
REGULAR BOARD MEETING
JULY 5, 2007
7:00 P.M.
PRESENT:
Mayor W. Rodney Knowles, Mayor Pro-Tem Larry Hardison, Aldermen
Richard Farley, Fred Handy, Richard Peters, Daniel Tuman and Town
Manager Brad Smith
CALL TO
ORDER: Mayor Knowles called the
meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the North Topsail Beach meeting
room.
INVOCATION: Reverend Dewayne
Collins gave the invocation.
PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE:
The Board of Aldermen and Citizens recited
the Pledge of Allegiance.
APPROVAL OF
AGENDA:
Alderman Tuman made a motion to approve the agenda. Alderman Farley
seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously.
NORTH
TOPSAIL UTILITIES, INC EXPANSION STATUS UPDATE- DANNY LASSITER:
Mr. Lassiter, Regional Manager
for Carolina Water service came forward to speak. He gave the Board
brief updates on what is going to happen over the winter. He stated
that he hopes North Topsail Beach has noticed the odor control
device they have placed at the lift station at the high rise
bridge. He stated after much time and funds that have been spent at
this point and time they feel it is doing an adequate job and North
Topsail Utilities hopes North Topsail Beach feels the same and if
not they would certainly like to know.
Mr. Lassiter stated this winter
they had all the simplex stations through out the Island surveyed by
GPS and located on the map so in the event of a hurricane or another
natural disaster, it will make it much easier for them to locate
these critical points including man holes and major critical
valves. He stated the most important part that North Topsail Beach
is wanting to hear is that June 27, 2007 Department of Water Quality
accepted their fast tract application for expansion to North Topsail
Utilities Waste Water Treatment Plant. He stated the schedule they
have given them is that July 25th they will have a
submittal meeting, on August the 8th there will be a
review meeting, that is where they will talk about the plans and
they will give them suggestions and recommendations. On August 29,
2007 they will have an ad info meeting where North Topsail Utilities
will go back and answer DWQ’s questions. On September 28, 2007
North Topsail Utilities hopes to receive a permit to construct from
DWQ. He stated the projected start construction date is December 5,
2007 and the projected completion of the first phase is October 24,
2008.
Mr. Lassiter stated the first
phase expansion is for total flow including what is already there
819,000 gallons to be 1,159,297 gallons which is an increase of
340,136 gallons for the equivalence of 945 taps at 360 gallons per
tap. He stated there will be at least two to three additional
phases and they will be submitting those standard review processes
at the time they receive approval of the first phase so there will
not be a lapses in time when they submit for the second, third and
forth phase if a forth is needed. He stated their intentions are to
build a plant for 3.4 million gallons of total flow capacity.
COMMITTEE
REPORTS:
BEACH
NOURISHMENT- DICK MACARTNEY:
Our town has
had a good month and a good week. We have had many visitors all
drawn here because of the ocean and the chance to enjoy our
beaches. With the movie “Nights of Rodanthe” now finished shooting
it won’t be long before our beach will show up on the silver
screen. This week a record number of beach goers are enjoying a
perfect beach vacation with wide beaches, beautiful sunshine and
even nighttime fireworks in the sky.
Our
responsibility as a beach nourishment committee is to ensure that
scenes such as I just described will be repeated in the years to
come. Although much of our NTB shoreline is in good shape there are
at least thirty buildings that do not have much protection against
the next eroding tide. The most glaring examples are on the north
end and the most severe is building eight of Topsail Reef.
I toured there
last week with Steve Dye, our Washington DC based lobbyist with
Marlowe and Company. He addressed the Topsail Island Shore
Protection Commission last Tuesday night and gave a favorable
although not conclusive report regarding the funding for our federal
beach nourishment project that is still in the feasibility stage.
He gave us some expectations as to how the budget process might work
and the hurdles that lay ahead in getting the construction phase
funded once the study phase is over. The time line for this project
to be started is still 2012 and beyond.
Regarding the
CRBA section of our town where we will need non federal funding to
complete beach nourishment, there is also some news to report.
Tuesday of this week, Shelia Cox, Brad Smith and I had a conference
call with Doug Huggett, the state CAMA official in charge of our
permits. He admitted that he had not done anything regarding our
permits based on the referendum vote of last November. He explained
that there are many other beaches also trying to get permits and
that ours was no longer on top of his stack.
At the last
Project Development meeting April 25th he had made some
comments about needing mitigation for waiving the requirements for a
500 meter buffer for offshore sand borrowing sites. The purpose of
this call was to clarify was he meant by these comments and what the
possible financial impact to our project might be. He started out
by mentioning reef balls, an artificial means of establishing fish
habitat, which is projected to cost $1,000,000 per acre of affected
hard bottom. To put this into perspective our offshore sand borrow
area is 640 acres.
After some
discussion helped along by our consultant, Craig Kimmel, of CP&E and
by my recounting of some earlier positions that Mr. Huggett had
taken in earlier PDT meetings that we both attended, we came to an
understanding that our preliminary Environmental Impact Statement
will contain “Conditional Mitigation” which will only be triggered
if unlikely and unforeseen effects cause harm to either the offshore
and the near shore hard bottoms. Our consultants feel confident
based on experiences in Florida and with other projects similar to
ours that such events are not very probable based on the state of
engineering models they have been using.
So that is
good, but because of the setback of our referendum vote we are still
probably a year away from getting our permits. That rules out any
BN project until the winter of 2008-2009. There has been recent
progress on finding outside funding from the state and from the
county according to Manger Smith. Although not granting any money
in this year’s budget it does appear that when permits are in hand
that Onslow county will share costs for any project that involves re
positioning and widening the New River Inlet. The Commissioners did
stipulate that they would need positive proof of taxpayer support
before making funds available.
Our committee
then will be looking at ways to generate the proof that our town is
willing to support a phased in beach nourishment plan with a
combination of outside (state and county) funding in conjunction
with local funding (sand tax, accommodations tax, and perhaps
capital reserve funds). We will be discussing at our next meeting
how to survey the taxpayers and what questions to ask and when.
However, this county guidance should assure many of the critics that
before any beach nourishment construction projects are contracted
that there will be plenty of education about the plan and a method
to engage the opinions of all taxpayers both resident and non
resident.
The next
meeting of the Beach Nourishment Committee will be Wednesday July
20, at 6:30 PM right here in town hall.
Thank you
Dick Macartney
Chair of Beach Nourishment Committee
PLANNING BOARD- MIKE YAWN:
Mr. Yawn came forward and read his
report as follows:
The Planning Board held our regular
meeting on Thursday June 14, 2007. The most important topics were
three appeals on our newly adopted zoning maps. We spent a great
deal of time and accessed the Board of Aldermen minutes from the
past.
-
Appeal by Mr. Walters: Tax map
Id # 774-16.1 - After studying the 12/3/98 minutes the PB
unanimously recommends that this parcel be corrected have the
front portion as R-5 and the rest as CON-D, per the motion made
in 1998. This is in agreement with the Aldermen's motion.
-
Appeal by Mr. Currin: Tax Map
Id# 763-1.3 - After studying the 10/7/93 minutes the PB
unanimously recommends that this entire parcel along with 809-60
be corrected to R-20. This is in agreement with the Board of
Aldermen's motion.
-
Appeal by Mr. Marshall F.
Dodson, Jr.: Map Id # 779-1.19 - tabled that for an on-site
visit. This site involves accreted land, roughly triangular in
shape, with different zoning on each side of the triangle.
The next Planning Board meeting is
Thursday 7/12/2007 at 6:30 pm.
We held the LUP meeting on Wednesday
6/27/2007. Worked through the remaining Policy sections. Still have
a few more pages to add then a full review. I anticipate the full
draft will be to the Aldermen in September for review/input; then it
goes to CAMA for review.
Our next LUP
meeting is Wednesday 7/25/2007 at 5pm.
Alderman Peters
asked Mr. Yawn how these properties were discovered. Mr. Yawn
stated they were discovered by the property owners. Alderman Peters
asked Mr. Yawn how many more are out there like these. Mr. Yawn
stated he has discovered a few more but they need to be researched
which they are across the street from Mr. Swantek.
MANAGER’S
REPORT:
1. Deb
Hill and I are working on scheduling the workshop on pools, parking,
and garbage issues with Ginger Booker. We are trying to work with
everyone’s vacation schedule. We need this workshop before the
zoning ordinance is finished and presented.
2. I
made a presentation before the County Commissioners requesting funds
for beach nourishment. They are hesitant in this budget to commit
tourism funds for beach nourishment. They requested that the Town
have the permits in hand, a defined project, and demonstrated
support of the majority of the citizens before they would commit any
funds to beach nourishment. They also reinforced one of their
reasons for changing the sales tax distribution method was to give
the coastal communities a revenue source for such infrastructure
funding.
3. The
swimming alert that was issued last week for one day at County Beach
Access #4 was due to bacteria levels in the water above normal
limits. The NC Recreational Water Quality Program was responsible
for the testing and issuing the alert. If we had had a higher
concentration of bacteria, then they would have issued a swimming
advisory and posted signs. They state that it could have been
caused due to an increase in gull activity in the area, people not
cleaning up after their pets. Since the high bacteria count only
lasted one day, they are no longer concerned.
4. Lydia and
I met with representatives from
BB&T Banking. The purpose was to inform the Town of the products
that BB&T offers and that they are very competitive with other
financial institutions.
5. The
subdivision and illegal lot workshop will have to be scheduled in
August since Mr. Kilroy is out of Town for the month of July. Deb
will be in touch to schedule this vital workshop.
6. The
Beach Nourishment Finance Committee met last Friday. We have
tentatively worked out the financing for the first phase of beach
nourishment. This plan calls for doing beach nourishment in phases
and we pay as we go. This plan needs to be endorsed by the Beach
Nourishment Committee and then the Town Board. Also, the committee
unanimously agreed that a survey or referendum of the citizens be
conducted before any action or money is spent except for obtaining
permits.
OPEN FORUM:
Mr. Swantek 3772 Island Dr. came
forward to speak; he stated he had a suggestion on the three Public
Access that the Town owns. He is getting tired of watching people
squatting over and using the bathroom. He stated these belong to
the Town and the Town should supply a porta potty for three months
out of the year at least.
Mr. Swantek stated that around
where he lives off of Myrtle Drive they removed a fire hydrant over
a year ago and never replaced it. They are telling the property
owner from where they removed it from that he is responsible for
paying to have it put back in. He stated that he thought it would
be the Town’s Fire Department’s responsibility to get the fire
hydrant back in place.
Mr. Smith stated that he would
talk to ONWASA and get back with Mr. Swantek.
CONSENT
AGENDA:
Board Minutes
Department Heat Reports
Benefit Accrual Report
Alderman Farley suggested
pulling Budget vs. Actual under the consent agenda and moving it to
Old Business (b).
Under Budget vs. Actual Alderman
Peters made a suggestion to consider comparison of the Police and
Fire Department statistics as they were presented a year ago. Mr.
Smith stated he could put them in an historical prospective.
Alderman Handy moved to
approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Alderman Peters seconded the
motion, motion passed unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS:
a)
Public Hearing and Rezoning of Property
Tax ID # 763-1.4 case # R-07-01:
Mayor
Knowles stated the Public Hearing has been postponed until August.
b)
Budget vs. Actual:
Alderman Tuman stated the Town
can’t keep the budget open until August. Mr. Smith agreed you can’t
do that. Alderman Tuman asked why keep the books open until
August. Mr. Smith stated everyone keeps their books open, you can’t
close the books, and there are payments coming in and sales tax. He
stated it is standard across the state of North Carolina to keep the
books open until August or September.
Mr. Smith stated the Town has to
take in its last revenues then it can close the books, and then have
the audit done.
Alderman Tuman stated the Town
just raised taxpayer’s tax rate by .03 per $100.00 and he looked at
the Beach Nourishment fund and according to the Budget vs. Actual
the Town is going to run over a half a million dollars surplus. Mr.
Smith stated that is correct. Alderman Tuman stated that is the .03
the Town raised taxes by. He stated the Town is taking people’s
money just to save it and he does not believe it is necessary.
Mr. Smith stated when he
presented the Budget there were options for a compromise.
NEW BUSINESS:
a)
Appeal of Rezoning of Tax ID# 763-1.3
by Mr.Currin
Ms.
Hill stated this is one of the appeals Mr. Yawn spoke of earlier.
This property is at the end of 23rd St. She stated the
Planning Board reviewed this at their June 14th meeting
and recommended unanimously that the property be zoned in accordance
with the October 1993 motion that was approved by the Board of
Aldermen and be corrected to R-20.
Alderman Tuman asked if the information supplied in the package in
support of making the change was reflected in the minutes.
Mr.
Yawn stated that the minute’s state rezoning part of Con-D and part
of the MHR to R-20. He stated the motion was made by Mayor Pro-Tem
Tripp and seconded by Alderman Stackleather to rezone Hunters Cove
tract located off Hwy 210 at the end of 23rd Ave from
Con-D and MHR to R-20 and passed 2-1.
Alderman Tuman stated when he went on GIS and looked for that
particular piece of property, he saw no record of that being Hunters
Cove Tract. He stated that property is in the name of Ccam Land
Associates and ownership was obtained on December 3, 1991. He
stated in the forth quarter of the year in 2004 there was an
activity in the Town involving the Planning Board, Zoning Officer
and a hired consultant that basically tried to recreate an accurate
Zoning Map for the Town and they went back through the entire
history of the Town and identified all of the zoning actions that
were taken and then established what they thought to be a correct
Zoning Map. He presumes that this was not identified by that
activity and that bothers him unless in fact the map is correct and
some other action was taken afterwards that basically established
that land as Con-D or in fact perhaps the people have the same
problem that he has which is being reminded by the Town Attorney
that they are bound by the minutes of the actions adopted at
meetings that Hunters Cove Tract might not be that land name.
He
stated normally when the Town has a rezoning it specifically
identifies the property by tax ID or a pen number. He stated the
package provided to him also address two other lots and for all he
knows that could be Hunters Cove. He stated 763-1.3 has always been
Con-D. Mr. Yawn stated he would go and look it up in the Minute
book again.
Alderman Tuman stated he is not comfortable with what the intent of
the rezoning action that was taken in November of 1993. He stated
there is no such thing as Hunters Cove Tract.
Mr.
Yawn stated the Planning Board felt the motion did match the piece
of property and Mr. Riggs had maps that he provided from that point
and time that showed one MHR lot and that seemed to match the motion
that was made in 1993.
Mr.
Currin came forward to speak he stated when this property was
purchased in 1991; it came from the Hunter Tract. He stated there
were two lots set up as mobile home lots, one of them was wetlands
and the second one 801-60 is still a decent lot. He stated the good
property is all the uplands property that is R-20 and has always
been R-20 and it was R-20 in 2002 when the Corps of Engineers went
in there and designated the wetlands out of it.
Mr.
Currin stated this property was R-20 up until the new Zoning Map was
done, he stated this is just a misprint on the map and that is the
only thing that is wrong with this property.
Alderman Tuman stated the map the Town adopted in 1990 had that
property as Con-D. He stated it had to be otherwise this action
would not have been necessary.
Mr.
Currin stated the property was R-20 in 1992, 1993 and in 2007 it’s
still R-20 and it’s just a misprint on the map and according to the
Town Manager when he talked to him two months ago.
Alderman Tuman stated if in fact it was R-20 then the action taken
and assuming it was appropriate action and refers to the right
property would not have been taken.
Mr.
Yawn stated he didn’t think it was R-20 in 1992, he thinks it was
Con-D. He stated looking at the 1982 map it is Con-D and it looks
like after 1993 someone colored in with yellow pencil on the hand
drawn map and it does show that as being as being R-20. He stated
the Planning Board did look at the motion and after reading the
motion the Planning Board felt like this did point to this
particular piece of property and the motion from the Board of
Aldermen in 1993 did change it from Con-D to R-20 and there was one
lot of MHR that is 809-60 that went from MHR to R-20 and the
Planning Board unanimously said yes it looks like they made a
coloring mistake on this map.
Alderman Tuman made a motion to send the rezoning of property tax ID
# 763-1.3 back to the Planning Board and be very specific of what
the decision of the Board of Aldermen was at the time. Mayor
Pro-Tem Hardison seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously.
OPEN FORUM:
Aaron Perkins 1263 New River Inlet Road came forward to speak. He
stated there is a public cross over in front of his house and since
April the garbage cans that used to be maintained by the Town are no
longer there. He stated there is quite a bit of contaminants around
that cross over and that may have contributed to some of the beach
contamination.
Alderman Peters stated he has walked that part of the beach
and he has talked to the Town’s Public Works about three weeks ago
and asked them to put additional garbage cans out. He stated they
did put two or three out there but still need about four more cans
out in that area.
ALDERMANS REPORT:
Mayor Pro-Tem Hardison thanked everyone for coming to the meeting.
Alderman Farley stated there is a proposal in the North Carolina
Legislature to implement a property transfer tax on sales tax on
individual homes, it could be very expensive and those of you who
live in North Topsail Beach could potentially not pay any income tax
on the sale of your house but still pay Onslow County one percent of
the value. He suggests the citizens contact the legislatures and
tell them you are not in favor of the home tax.
ADJOURNMENT:
Alderman Tuman made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:30 p.m.
Alderman Peters seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously.
Minutes prepared and submitted by Terrie Woodle, Permit Specialist. |